|
DEDICATION
In memory
of George (Doddy) Hay.
1918 - 2001
Scottish Patriot and
Nationalist who Introduced me to Andrew Fletcher.
'Na! Na! Laddie,
I have NOT Deserted the SNP. The SNP deserted me!'
Quotation taken from conversation
Doddy had with a senior SNP apparatchik. In his will, Doddy left
me his two most precious possessions, two books on the Life, Times
and sayings of Andrew Fletcher. His Daughter gave them to me after
His funeral and passed on a personal message to me 'Tell Niall to
keep up the struggle for Independence and may he have inspiration
from Andra's words.'
So, Mo Chairdean choir.
I would like to share with you all,
the story of a Scottish patriot, whose life story was an inspiration
to Doddy, and is an inspiration today, in my life. Fellow Scots
may I introduce:
Andrew Fletcher
- The Patriot - (1653 - 1716)
You may wonder why I should have
chosen a man who was of the privileged land-owning class. The answer
is simple, landowner and privileged as he was, he was prepared to
lay down his Life as well as his worldly goods for the sake of Scotland.
Andrew Fletcher's great grandfather came from the MacGregor country
and bought land in Achallander. The name of 'fletcher' comes from
the anglicised gaidhlig 'Mac an Fleishdair' meaning a 'maker of
arrows'. The Fletchers of Achallander served as a sept of the MacGregors
of Glenorchy.
The Family later moved to Innerpeffer
and Andrew Fletcher (b1598? - d1650)a prominent lawyer, a Senator
of the College of Justice 1623 and again 1641, purchased the lands
of Saltoun in East Lothian in 1643. Andrew Fletcher senior was made
Lord Innerpeffer in 1623. His son, Sir Robert Fletcher of Saltoun
and Innerpeffer (d.1665), married Catherine Bruce, daughter of Sir
Henry Bruce of Clackmannan, who claimed ancestry from the grandfather
of King Robert the Bruce. Their Offspring included Andrew Fletcher
and his younger sibling Henry Fletcher.
As a Young man, He was educated privately
by Gilbert Burnett the Minister of the local Kirk and by the time
he was 14 years old, was fluent in Greek, Latin, French and English
with a fair grasp of Spanish and Italian. His tutelage included
classical history, geography and mathematics. He also studied Divinity
and Law at St Andrews University, as it was expected that he would
follow in the steps of his Father and Grandfather, both Lawyers
of repute. He was also interested in 'Improving' Agriculture by
better drainage and enrichment of the soil. Hybridisation of crop
stocks to produce heavier yields was his lifelong ambition and before
he died, he had achieved this aim. Doing away with wasteful land
use such as Runrig and enlarging fields so that more efficient ploughing
could take place.
He entered the Scots parliament in
1678, at the age of 28 taking the Haddingtonshire seat against the
preferred candidate of the Duke of lauderdale, John Maitland who
would later become his most implacable enemy. He fiercely argued
against The Conventicles Act and the imposition of Episcopalian
Bishops in Scotland on the grounds that Charles II would be just
as tyrannical as his predecessors. To quote from one of his pamphlets
distributed at the time, 'Better yet a republic than a blood bespattered
tyrant waxing gross and tyrannical upon the throne of Scotland.'
As a result of his continued opposition to Government diktat, military
policy against the Conventicles and Ministerial malfeasance he was
accused of sedition, by opposing the Duke of Lauderdale's scheme
to have the Scots parliament raise the sum of £1,800,000 to pay
off the kings debts and ingratiate himself with the King, incurring
thereby the great enmity of James Duke of York. (himself a Catholic
who believed in the divine right of kings to rule against which
Andrew fletcher had spoken in a public meeting at which He [The
Duke of York] was present, before many leading Scottish Nobles in
a clear reference to republicanism.)
Trumped up charges of Treason were
made against him (Later thrown out as illegal), and as a consequence,
Andrew had to flee to England in 1682 and seek refuge with Gilbert
Burnett, his old tutor, who was now Lecturer at St Clements in London
and was the most sought after preacher in that city. Whilst he was
there, Fletcher met The Protestant Duke of Monmouth and was persuaded
to Join the Duke of Monmouth at a secret meeting of the Council
of Six in London.
Shortly afterwards he was warned
of his imminent arrest and took ship to the Netherlands where he
was given sanctuary by William Duke of Orange. He later returned
in May 1685 with the Duke of Monmouth and landed in the west country
as Master (General) of the Dukes Horse. But, this expedition was
doomed from the very start by poor organisation and leadership,
and Fletcher was sent to Spain after a bicker with Heywood Dare,
Mayor of Taunton, one of the Duke of Monmouth's trusted advisors,
in an argument over a horse. Dare accused Fletcher of being a 'Scotch
Thief!' and hit him across the face twice with his whip, cutting
Fletchers face badly and leaving him scarred for life. Fletcher
drew his pistol, calling on Heywood Dare to stop and when dare hit
him for the third time, Shot him dead!
Had this not occurred, it is certain
that Fletcher would have been either killed leading the cavalry
at the Battle of Sedgemoor by the king's artillery which utterly
destroyed Monmouths Horsemen, or else Hanged, drawn and quartered
the same year at Tower Hill with Monmouth and his surviving officers.
Instead, he took Monmouth's advice to sail to Bilbao. Shortly afterwards
the Alcalde of Bilbao had him imprisoned a few weeks after landing.
He was ordered to be delivered up in chains and transported to London
for execution as a Rebel. Monmouth had been proclaimed briefly as
King James II, having branded James Duke of York a popish usurper.
Fletcher, then in Spain, was condemned as a traitor on 4th Jan 1686,
having lost his estates. He was rescued from prison by a stranger
who bribed his Guards to look the other way. He then travelled throughout
northern Spain and the pyrenees in disguise, buying many rare and
curious books and staying a long while with a Scottish banker named
Kerr.
Fletcher then went to Hungary to
fight as a volunteer with Duke Charles of Lorraine with some distinction
in two battles against the Turks in 1688 and was rewarded with the
rank of Colonel of Horse, after the battle of Mohacs and whilst
he was there he received a letter from Gilbert Burnett on behalf
of the Prince of Orange summoning him to return to the Netherlands
and joined William of Orange at The Hague. On returning to the hague,
he received the news that he had been tried again in absentia, His
Name declared 'Infamous' (To have one's name blotted out of all
records as if one had never existed.) and his estates forfeit to
the crown and given to a crony of King James II. Andrew was appointed
as Inspector General of William's cavalry and spent much time in
the Dutch countryside, studying their advanced systems of Agriculture
and milling which would in years to come, greatly benefit Scotland.
Andrew Fletcher returned on the 4th
November 1688, landing with William of Orange's Flagship at Torbay
at the time of the Revolution when William of Orange assumed the
crown. William gave him secret instructions to sound out the state
of opinion of the Scots towards him and whether or not they would
accept him as King. He did so in the curious position of being a
Kings messenger and also a wanted outlaw that anyone could kill
on sight. A very dangerour prediciament indeed. He reported back
to William of Orange that the people of Scotland would require him
to be 'King of Scots' NOT King of Scotland on the English constitutional
model. He would have to rule through the Estates of Parliament as
the Scottish constitution required, NOT ruling by Divine right,
arbitary and by Decree.
At this William was greatly enraged!
He refused outright to give any such undertaking because in William's
view, The prerogatives, Powers and personal conduct of Princes were
no subject of discussion by the subjects. Furthermore William spitefully
dismissed Andrew Fletcher from his service, without paying his due
arrears of pay, leaving him destitute Here was an impasse that was
to dog Andrew Fletcher's dealings with William for years and help
to firm up his Republican Views over the years ahead.
He returned to Scotland in the company
of Andrew Paterson from Dumfries and from him gained many insights
into Industry, trade and commerce. Paterson was a Banker and generously
loaned Andrew monies to help him along the way as Fletcher, being
sacked as master of Williams Cavalry was now without any means of
income He had to move around from friends houses to houses as there
was still a £1,000 Reward out on him dead or alive and many of his
former enemies wanted him out of the way quickly. So Andrew travelled
throughout scotland under an assumed name (Mr Robertson of Strathearn)
to find out how the political land lay. He was sought out by James
Graham of Claverhouse , with the view of enlisting his support for
King James VII and regaining his estate, and Fletcher told him 'You
ask me to forswear all my dearest principles, all that I have stood
for, and call it no costly price? James Stuart is a tryrant, a fanatic
Papist and unfit to rule this Kingdom, his hands stained with blood,
much of which has been shed by yourself in his name, not for a score
of Saltoun's would I accede to your importunings!' The act and words
of a brave man of principle.
In 1690 He appeared in public functions
hosted by powerful friends with the intention of urging the Scottish
parliament to having King James declared abdicant. He did not mince
his words either. He persuaded many influential men to write up
the deed of Accession for William and Mary on the very same terms
Andrew Fletcher had previously outlined to the Prince of Orange
and these were eventually grudgingly accepted and signed. Despite
his opposition to King James and support for the Prince of Orange
his estate still remained forfeit. For years it was not returned
to him, thus revealing a serious flaw in William's character, a
pettiness, vindictiveness and small minded spiteful revenge. Eventually
in 1692 His forfeited estates were legally returned to him without
even a grudging word of apology or compensation and now Andrew Fletcher
embarked on the most productive and effectual part of his life.
PART II
Fletcher and
the Glencoe massacre.
With his estate newly restored to
him, Andrew Fletcher and Andrew Paterson worked hard on building
up support for the Darien scheme and it was at a dinner party in
Lord Belhavens house In early 1692, that there came the news of
the massacre of Glencoe that helped to bring the name of Andrew
Fletcher into prominence throughout Scotland. According to a Diarist
in the company, Andrew Fletcher first heard the news of the massacre
of Glencoe, which must have exploded like a thunderclap in that
gathering. In the latter stages of the meal, a courier was ushered
in and asked for the Master of the Stair, John Dalrymple, to whom
he produced a letter. The letter seemed to elate him and he called
out to the chancellor John Hay Earl of Tweedale. 'John! our trap
is sprung! And has caught me the fox! MacIan is dead, and his barbarous
brood with him. A notable blow struck for the weal of the realm!'
The Earl of tweedale was astounded and asked what had happened.
Dalrymple replied 'This letter is from Campbell of Glenlyon. He
mentions nothing of any fighting. Merely that he has carried out
my instructions. That all is well. MacIan of Glencoe and sundry
of his barbarous tribe of Highland scum, are dead, aye, and Scotland
is the better place for the lack of them!' (The actual words spoken
have been translated from the late 17th Century English and the
plentiful legal Latin terms have been deleted to make the verbal
exchanges more understandable.)
As can be imagined, this broke up
the dinner party with Stair's friends and the others clamouring
for more information. Dalrymple sought to excuse it as necessary
for the polity of the peace of the realm. Fletcher challenged him,
'Master of the Stair, are we hearing correctly? Are we to understand
that MacIan of Glencoe, that old infirm man and a goodly number
of his MacDonald people have been slain? Not in Battle, but murdered
in cold blood? By Campbell of Glenlyon, acting on YOUR Instructions?'
(Like the good lawyer that he was, Andrew had struck at the heart
of the matter.) Stair immediately retorted, 'Murdered! I do not
like your choice of words Sir! Murder it is not! A ridiculous word
to use Sir, regarding traitors and rebels that must justly pay for
their misdeeds at the hands of the King's militia, cannot be called
murder but necessary justice for the good of the realm!'
Fletcher spoke to him again, 'What!
Without a trial? and at the hands of Campbells, their traditional
enemies, You Sir, a lawyer holding the highest position in the land,
son of the chiefest judge on the Kings bench in Scotland. DO SAY
THAT?' Stair retorted, 'I do Say! and also that you Fletcher should
stop meddling in the affairs of this Land, you know nothing of the
circumstances and your knowledge of the law has in the past proven
defective to your own cost!' Fletcher replied, 'I am the Commissioner
for Haddingtonshire in this Parliament. I am entitled, nay more
than that, duty bound to seek the Law upheld. By whomsoever! On
whose orders and instructions were these people slain?' Stair then
replied, ' On the Kings Sir. and on mine as Secretary of State.
On His Grace's written directive.'
Andrew Fletcher then interjected,
' May I ask what were Glen Lyons orders? has he exceeded them? or
is this, this massacre happened as you so Instructed him, master
of the Stair?' Stair possibly feeling the argument was now going
his way replied ' I am not answerable to such as you, Fletcher,
I do not need to give account of my actions , nor indeed even to
you my Lord Chancelor, may I remind all that I am the Kings Secretary
of State not Parliament's. I take my instructions from His Grace,
and His Grace's order's were to extirpate that nest of thieves,
those were His actual written words. The Kings command has been
carried out, so Fletcher if you have quarrel with it then it with
the Kings Grace not with me.'
Andrew Fletcher now gave his reply,
is the Kings Grace above the Law, my Lord? Master of the Stair,
as Scotlands senior lawyer here can you tell us that ? Stair then
replied the Monarch is not above the Law, no. In this realm. but
He is shall we say the Laws ultimate interpreter and guardian. If
He so interprets the Law for the best benefit of his subjects as
a whole then to challenge it would be treasonable. 'Fletcher immediately
retorted treasonable or no, I challenge it ! as must all here if
we value our honour. I once believed William of Orange to be an
honourable man even though , like other men he can act mistakenly.
But this, this is beyond all bearing . Execution without trial,
without legal sanction, of a number of the Kings subjects , in time
of peace! Scottish subjects on the orders of a man who has never
so much set foot in Scotland1' Stair merely dismissed Him, 'on the
orders of the lawful King of Scots Sir! I advise you to walk carefully
and guard your tongue, your words verge upon treason, Sir, treason!'
Stair then delved into his portfolio of Papers and produced two
letters, 'These are copies of the Orders, Read them for yourself!'
To the Privy Council of Scotland.
Edinburgh.
My Lords.
'We do consider it indispensible
to the weal of that our kingdom to apply the necessary severities
of law' The letter then went on to require the Privy Council to
mobilize troops and support the Commander in Chief 'to cut off these
obstinate rebels by all manner of hostility' and furthermore to
see that no blame or harm is attached to those carrying out the
orders.
(Shortened for Clarity and brevity).
Fletcher then read the second order:
To Captain Robert Campbell
of Glenlyon
For Their Majesties' Service
Sir
You are hereby ordered to
fall upon the rebels, the M'Donalds, of Glencoe and putt all to
the sword under seventy. You are to have special care that the old
fox and his sons doe upon no account escape your hands. You are
to secure all the avenues, that no man may escape. This you are
to putt in execution at five o'clock in the morning precisely, and
by that time, or very shortly after it, I'll strive to be att you
with a stronger party. If I doe not come to you att five, you are
not to tarry for me, but to fall on. This is by the King's special
command, for the good of the country, that these miscreants be cutt
off root and branch. See that this be putt in execution without
feud or favour, else you may expect to be treated as not true to
the king's government, nor a man fitt to carry a commission in the
king's service. Expecting you will not faill in the fulfilling hereof
as you love yourself, I subscribe these with my hand.
Master of the Stair
(John Dalyrmple)
Fletcher
then remarked, 'We have a new Gallienus * set over us and he has
started in Scotland by the de-Witting of Glencoe.' There is no record
of what the master of the Stair said before he left. But Fletchers
words referred to the murder of the Republican De Witt brothers
in 1672 which brought William of Orange to power as Stadtholder
and in which he was most certainly involved as the chief instigator.
Fletcher had made a dangerous enemy in the Master of the Stair and
Stair later made numerous attempts to have Fletcher arraigned for
treason, Jacobism, Republicanism, secularism and free thinking.
Fletcher then wrote letters to the newspapers, and denounced Stair
and the King whenever he could. He published many papers on the
theme of Gallienus and the De Witt brothers. He attempted to have
Parliament recalled, but this was refused by the King, who nonetheless,
summarily dismissed The Master of Stair from his Court in London,
on account of the embarrassment he had caused him.. Two years later
he was quietly re-instated into a close group of Scots nobles to
bring about the eventual Union of the two Parliaments.
*(Gallienus) A Roman Emporer of the
3rd century who always killed anyone who spoke out against him or
questioned his orders
In a letter of the 5th. March, 1692,
after referring to the widespread talk in London about the massacre,
dalrymple says, "All
I regret is, that any of the sort got away; and there is a necessity
to prosecute them to the utmost." Again, writing to Colonel Hill
in April of the same year, he tells him that "as for the people
of Glencoe, when you do your duty in a thing so necessary to rid
the country of thieving, you need not trouble yourself to take the
pains to vindicate yourself. When you do right, you need fear nobody.
All that can be said is, that, in the execution, it was neither
so full nor so fair as might have been."
Fletcher and the Darien Expedition.
'The only means
to recover us from our present miserable and despicable condition'.
Background to the Expedition.
As the 17th century drew to it's
close, lowland Scotland was in a desperate plight due to the famine
brought on by seven years of crop failure in succession. Andrew
Fletcher put this down to the feudal system of 'Runrig' which was
grossly inefficient and the landowners failure to improve the quality
and fertility of the soil by investment in agrarian improvements.
Fletcher had already abandoned Runrig and had spent much time and
effort in developing efficient land management on the model practised
by the early Celtic church and developed by the Cistercians. During
the hot dry summers, the field drainage systems and composting of
the soil on his estate farms allowed the crops to survive the high
temperatures and dryness of seven dry summers. Only in the Highlands
where composting with seaweed was practiced was there no comparable
famine.
Another major factor was the high
cost of maintaining a standing army for William of orange to use
in fighting his overseas wars in Europe. Borne completely by the
people of scotland this was a heavy burden in light of the fact
that 45% of Williams Army were Scots. Andrew Fletcher says in a
speech to Parliament, 'We
have voted His majesty a standing army, though we had more need
to have saved the money to have bought bread for thousands of our
people that were starving for want afforded us the melancoly prospect
of dying by shoals in our streets, and have left behind them reigning
contagion, which hath swept away multitudes more, and God knows
where it will end. Have not the Scots, ever since the Union of the
crowns been oppressed and tyrannised over by a faction in England,
who will neither admit of a Union of the Nations, nor leave us Scots
in possession of our own privileges, as Men and Christians?'
(Authors note. Nothing has really changed since then!)
Fletcher and Paterson worked hard
from late 1691 to 1695 to plan a scheme along with others which
would reverse Scotland's ill fortunes and generate trade denied
to them by the great English monopolies. Therefore in 1693, to pave
the way, Andrew Fletcher proposed 'An bill for the encouragement
of Foreign Trade.' This was passed with an overwhelming majority.
In its original form, the scheme for the Company had been drawn
up by a group of Scots merchants in London and principally by the
aforementioned William Paterson, Banker, ex buccaneer and trader
whose creative intellect was in advance of his time. He and his
companions proposed a joint Scots and English venture, but this
was effectively squashed by the English trading companies especially
the East India Company with their monopolies on Colonial trade and
their threatened impeachment of its founders before the House of
Commons.
In June 1695, the Scots Parliament
passed an act authorizing the establishment of a Company of Scotland
Trading to Africa and the Indies. The Marquis of Tweeddale was the
King's Commissioner, and knew that the King strongly disapproved,
however he lent his support to the considerable pressure of the
Estates, touched the Act with the sceptre, and thus gave it the
royal assent without first giving William the opportunity to read
it. the spirit and challenge of this 'noble undertaking' inflamed
the imagination of the country. Fletcher said that men and women
seemed moved by a Higher Power toward the 'only means to recover
us from our present miserable and despicable condition'.. A following
attempt to enlist the support of the Hanseatic towns was also stopped
by the English merchantile monopoly, and Scotland went bravely ahead
alone.
In an atmosphere of feverish enthusiasm,
Scots men and women, burghs, corporations and associations subscribed
four hundred thousand pounds toward the Company, believed to be
half the available capital of the nation. Patriotism was married
to profit, and the issue was assured. 'Trade will increase trade,'
Paterson had said, 'and money will beget money.' The Council-General
of the Company abandoned its earlier thoughts of Africa and decided
to establish a colony and an entrepôt on the coast of Darien,
the most inhospitable and unhealthy part of the Isthmus of Panama.Ships
were bought, built or chartered in Holland and Hamburg, and the
Company's warehouses at Leith and Glasgow were slowly filled with
a collection of goods which, it was confidently believed, could
be exchanged for the spices, silks and gold of the Orient. 'Darien',
said Paterson, would be the 'door of the seas, the key of the universe',
reducing by half the time and expense of navigation to China and
Japan by the digging of a canal across the isthmus, and bringing
peace to both oceans without the guilt of war.
In July, 1698, five ships left Leith
upon a great wave of emotion. They sailed north about and down the
Atlantic, made a landfall off the coast of Darien in November, and
claimed it as the Colony of Caledonia. Many of the colonists were
already dead from flux and fever, and their leaders were inefficient
and quarrelsome. The splendid harbour chosen was a trap for vessels
that could not sail to windward. Ambition, pride and envy, aggravated
by ignorant stupidity, destroyed the spirit of those who survived
the killing fevers. The town of New Edinburgh was never more than
a few palmetto huts, and the ramparts of Fort St Andrew were washed
away by the pitiless rain. The Spaniards' claim to Darien had been
acknowledged by William and the English government, but their attempt
to retake it was repulsed by the Scots in a little jungle skirmish.
The English Parliament then commissioned
Admiral benbow to blockade the colony with a fleet of English Royal
Navy Frigates to aid the spanish. This did not deter the colonists
who had already dug a half mile section of the canal. When the English
colonies of America and the Caribbean were then ordered to give
no help to Darien, the survivors lost their courage and abandoned
the huts, the fort and the bay. While this was going on, Andrew
Fletcher was indefatigable in raising another £300,000 to equip
four relief ships from the Forth. In a debate in parliament He expressed
his anger and resentment of English arrogance and contempt,
'They
must not think that we have so far degenerated from the courage
and honour of our ancestors as tamely to submit to become their
vassals, when for two thousand years, We have maintained our freedom,
and therefore it is not in their interest to oppress us too much.
If they consult their histories they will find that we always broke
their yoke at the long run!'
Despite the bitterness of famine,
and the shortage of money and supplies, Scotland had assembled another
expedition of four ships, and it was already at sea before the failure
of the first was known. It reached Caledonia in November, 1699,
and found only a 'vast, howling wilderness', but the huts were rebuilt
and the fort reoccupied. From the beginning there was jealousy and
disunity, fever, desertion and mutiny, and the ministers sent by
the General Assembly violently abused the sick and dying for their
'atheistical cursing and swearing, brutish drunkenness and detestable
mockery'.
Once again the Spaniards attacked,
and were once again thrown back in the green wet mist of the jungle
by the efforts of the Highland fencibles sent by the Duke of Argyle.
When they blockaded the colony by sea and land, advanced their guns
and trenches to the rotting ramparts of the fort, the Scots resisted
bravely for a month and then surrendered. On April 12, 1700, Caledonia
was finally abandoned to the Spanish.
In the first week of May, three ships
sighted the hills of Jamaica. Two hundred and fifty souls had died
of yellowjack on this voyage to Jamaica. In the following two months,
with little relief and no credit, another hundred died. These included
'..The Darien venture was perhaps the worst disaster in Scotland's
history, and few nations can withstand the terrible loss of pride
and money. Its exchequer and storehouses were empty, and its challenge
to the mercantile power of England was now a mockery. Nine ships
which the Company had bought or chartered were sunk, burnt or abandoned.
A call had been made upon three-quarters of the subscribed capital,
and it was all lost. Only three hundred of the colonists, soldiers
and seamen returned to Scotland.
Two thousand men, women and children
had been drowned at sea, buried in the foetid earth of Darien, abandoned
in Spanish prisons, or lost for ever as indentured servants( Slaves
) in English colonies. The anger of the people was intense, and
was not reduced when the King said that their colony had been a
threat to peace. Nor was his promise to promote their trade, to
repair their losses if possible, more than bitter comfort. Few men
blamed the failure of the colony upon the nature of its location,
the contentious inefficiency of its leaders, or the blind ignorance
of its promoters. English treachery was responsible. Great men who
knew this to be an exaggeration, publicly agreed rather than challenge
the outraged emotions of the nation.
|